You are currently browsing the grainy tag archives.


Posted 2012.07.26 12.19 in Photography, Pointless Blather

I think people have gotten confused about what the word Impossible means.

A lot of times I get told this is impossible, that is impossible. I think the word is over-used. There’s a big difference between Impossible and Not Easy, or Not Worthwhile, or even just I didn’t think to try it yet.

Really, when people say Impossible, I just assume they mean that they either can’t figure it out, or haven’t even been arsed to try.

Today’s impossible thing was taking a 15 year old film disc, that I exposed a year ago, and processing it myself here at home.

For those of you who missed it, Disc cameras were a very short-lived thing that came up in the ’80s and died by the ’90s. It was a tiny format, smaller even than 110 film. The only thing going for it was that the cameras were flat and skinny, like two decks of cards side-by-side. Easily fitting in a pocket or handbag.

But the film was expensive and the quality was terrible, while 35mm P&S cameras got smaller and smaller but their quality remained acceptable (a 35mm neg is at least 6x larger than a disc negative.)

Anyhow, I had come across a couple un-used film discs, and had to give it a shot. I found myself a wonderfully horrible little disc camera, an Ansco VR-1, for which I paid 99 cents. The VR-1 is plastic, powered by springs, and used a Flipflash if you needed light. No exposure adjustments, no focus, it is amazingly light and cheap and plastic. I believe it is a re-branded Halina, just bearing the Ansco name on the outside. It is exactly the same as this camera here.

So the shots I took were simple snapshots, using a Konica ISO200 disc that had spent at least a decade gathering dust at the local Goodwill. That was the easy part. Today I did the “impossible” and processed it myself.

It wasn’t all that impossible actually. I just improvised a way to sit it inside my developing tank then used my worn out old C41 chemistry, happily ignoring the fact that disc film uses the “C41a” process (about which I could find no information.)

So what came out of it? Small, crappy, grainy, miscoloured pictures. Just like back in the 1980s!

Well actually mine are crappier and grainier but I attribute that to the film being 15 years past its best before date. I’ve had similar results from other old cheap film, like Sooters 126 colour film from the 90’s.

So what was the point of this whole grainy excercise? I just had to prove I could do it. Although I have two more unopened film discs, I can’t imagine any reason to try and use them.

What matters is that I now know that I could, if I really wanted to.

More Grainy Goodness

Posted 2011.09.05 19.34 in Hobbies, Photography

I ran another roll of film through my Pentax Auto 110 miniature SLR, and this time I was more careful about not confusing the automatic exposure system. The initial results had not been great. I had been hoping to see some improvement, and there is perhaps a bit, but not much.

Even with several pictures being taken under bright sunny conditions, everything has come out a bit underexposed again. At this point, I don’t know if there is a fault with the camera, or if it is a problem with my film – it is, after all, completely expired and of unknown age.

To be sure, I’ll have to try either another camera, or some different film, and see what sort of results come  out. In the meantime, here’s a few more pics.

As you can see, all the images show grain – the first and last show a lot, as they were indoors with insufficient light. Unfortunately even the outdoor / bright sunlight shots were underexposed and I had to push all the images when I was scanning them.